Campbell and Davis render chavismo banal, reducing it to the recklessness of Chavez’s charisma and people’s adoration of a now dead leader. Foreign Correspondent disappoints with ‘Venezuela Undercover’. A good-looking but trivial piece of ‘investigative journalism’. The 30-minute documentary by reporter Eric Campbell and producer Mike Davis, begins by asserting that Venezuela is, today, a ‘disaster’. Though very little in the documentary is offered that might allow the viewer to understand why ‘Venezuela is a disaster’. The imagery of Caracas, Venezuela’s capital, looks colourful and striking on screen, but the material accompanies a formulaic narration. Caracas is either manic and dangerous or a stagnant and politically depressed city. The assumption that Campbell or Davis are capable of reporting on Venezuela is naïve. That they should report on Venezuela is arrogant. Beyond Campbell’s statements on ‘populism’, ‘socialism’ and ‘oil wealth’, very little is said beyond a reference t...
Los amigos del blog communism nos invitan a acercarnos a una interpretación alemana contemporánea de Marx, la llamada « neue Marx-Lektüre». Y esto mediante la traducción de un artículo de fácil lectura de Ingo Elbe. En el breve artículo, «Between Marx, Marxism, and Marxisms – Ways of Reading Marx’s Theory», Elbe presenta a la figura de Karl Korsch como la primera clave para comprender el giro que se da más allá del marxismo tradicional (propiamente leninista y por lo tanto soviético), a un momento signado por marxismos plurales. Korsh, como sabemos, insistiría en la necesidad de comprender la concepción materialista de la historia mediante la misma concepción materialista de la historia. Es decir, cualquier propuesta teórica debiera poder explicarse a sí misma, o mejor, debe poder proponer y comprender sus propias condiciones de posibilidad. Para adentrarse en estos temas los invito a revisar el artículo de Elbe. Por cierto, este últ...
The theft of wood and the 'origins' of Marx's critique of political eocnomy. Barbara Harriss-White writes: 'At the age of 24 and soon after completing his doctoral thesis, Marx wrote the Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood (1842), in which he recognized private property as theft, the interests embodied in it as antithetical to those represented in customary law and the state as the guardian of private property. Arguably, the seed of his later political economy was germinated by this early analysis of wood theft which he wrote for the Rheinische Zeitung' (p. 102). Let us then now read such Debates. More later.
Comments
Post a Comment